Friends….. I am pasting the exact verbatim script of interview of Mr Anand Mahindra given to CNBC at WEF (world economic forum)…… M&M has a very clear, hard working, investor friendly management…… They are a very reputed group of business house in
Q: This theme resonate with you as well in some sense because last year’s meeting, the meeting that you do at the beginning of every year to set the tone for Mahindra & Mahindra (M&M), also was three ‘R’ dominating meeting. What does it mean to be able to rethink, redesign, rebuild in your context at M&M for the next decade? I am not talking about this year or the next two years, but this decade is going to be characterized by very different global economy as oppose to the last. What kind of work does that setout for you?
A: I am glad that my three R's came one year before. If you remember what I had said was reboot, reinvent and reignite and in a sense it could be paraphrasing the same thing. So we are prepared for this new decade that will emerge and for which the WEF is preparing.
We think it means that a whole number of old models of economic policies of financial regulation of the way in which businessmen monitor themselves all that has got to be rechanged or rethought. In other ways, they are saying think about your fundamental underlying propositions to everything you do and once you do that, once you create a Tabula Rasa, so to speak in your mind then you have to redesign. You have to redesign in order to build for that new world or to put on to that new clean slate. I hope that this conference does get down to that level and we do not spend time only arguing about how to rethink things and get into ideological battle. If we get beyond that and start talking about the actual redesigning of mechanism, the redesigning of regulations, that would be very useful.
‘Rebuild’ is a question of execution. I do not believe that’s the job of Davos or the WEF. What WEF wants is dialogue, conversation, rethinking and redesigning and then going out and executing. So I believe rebuild is more an instruction and a clarion call rather than something you are going to see accomplished at the WEF.
What does it mean for Mahindra? As I said we have a one year head start on this game plan so to speak. It means that we have to relook at every value proposition we have — what are people going to want, do we focus on peoples needs as oppose to their wants, which what we were thinking of doing earlier; do we have to go back to frugal engineering and frugal innovation is that going to be the mantra, how do we deploy it in a more judicious manner. Implementation is a common thread always, there is nothing different about rebuilding; one is always building, you are always destroying the old building the new. So I think the third ‘R’ is not really something we will agonize about. It’s the first two that Mahindra will be focusing on.
Q: Right now your business is obviously dominated by auto, over the next ten years; do you see businesses like IT become an equal part in terms of their contribution to revenue? What is the shape and the set of the contribution of the group likely to be five to eight years down the line, how are you planning that?
A: I am asked this question very often, questions about ‘What size group do you want to have? Ten years from now, what is the share of revenues is going to be?’ I believe that half the fun in my job is not trying to pin things down to that level or metrics. What you want is a template; you want to have a federation, a diversified federation that embodies a certain common set of values that embodies entrepreneurship that grows on
Last year, the IT sector had way surpassed the automotive and farm business in terms of both revenue and profits. This quarter it is the automotive and farm equipment sector that is back to being more than 60% of the pie and there were literally whoops in the air by those sectors. So I love that race, I love that competitiveness. Why should we presume that IT will be larger? I would love people to go in there and prove everyone wrong. The question is have you unleashed entrepreneurialism and growth and then let the chips fall where they may.
Q: You have also spoken about previously of one of your new interest and that is solar energy. How are you going to go about doing any of that? Why I am asking you this question is not to pin you down on which specific new businesses are you looking at over the course of the next ten years, but to better understand whether at the end of this decade is M&M going to be very different collection of businesses as oppose to how we see it today or will auto always dominate everything you do?
A: It could be any of the above. It could be auto continuing to dominate; it could be whole new slew of businesses that are coming out and have stolen the limelight, it might be a judicious mix. Solar energy, renewable for e.g. this is being done under the new internal private equity department, it is called Mahindra Partners and they have been doing work in fact for a good 18 months now in research into how we come out with a plan for solar energy. About a year ago I wrote an editorial in the ‘Times of
Q: When you say great intent can you tell us how it is going to work? Are you at M&M going to start up another company or business that is actually going to go about the business of putting up solar power plant or are you going to seed fund ventures that you think are exciting in the renewable space? Is this going to become in revenue line for M&M or an interest space?
A: I hope there is nothing I am doing that won’t become a revenue line for M&M otherwise I should probably have my salary reduced. So I certainly think that if we spend that kind of time there should be a revenue line and very positively a profit line as well. Which one could it be? That’s exactly what we are looking into right now. Should we be integrators, should we be developers, should we put out the plans which technology should we bet on, should we bet on a slew of technology? The one thing we are finding out is that there is no hard and fast roadmap today, there is no even within concentrating solar power (CSP) there is no specified technology. TV which looked like it would be falling behind suddenly is catching up again with thin film technology.
So it’s a very interesting field and what we are looking at is how do we play in this field, how do we become initiate as a projects and exploit the natural advantage that India has. There is no algorithm we have come up with yet, we will share at the moment we will have one.
Q: What else interests you that could potentially become a whole new business for M&M in the course of these next ten years?
A: The reason we have set up Mahindra Partners is so that we can explore all these new avenues. The thing that I found is that with relative success comes deal flow, when you demonstrate that you can create a viable model of new businesses that when you can maintain your value system and your reliability while doing that, then you get a number of technologists, companies overseas companies coming to you to look at how you can do business. So everyday there is new deal flow, which one of these will become something that M&M will bet on and will become a big business, I don't know. That is the fun of going to work everyday.
Q: Give me at least the spaces that you are interested in?
A: Everything comes in. What we look at is whether it is going to be something that we can scale up that could be material that has a place either in
My Comments are here……………..
Some estimate that the sun can produce 10,000 times as much energy as the Earth uses at the turn of the 21st century. The future of solar energy depends mostly on how it is applied, rather than whether it would be enough energy to be a viable world power source. The geographical location of
XL Telecom, Webel Energy, Moser Baer, Suryachakra, PAE are some stocks which are playing in solar energy area….. You need to watch them out…… All of them have great future.. though the management of XL telecom is fighting with poor results and high debt..
